Lotus Evora GT
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best estimated range565 km351 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Lightest1,408 kg3,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,408kg3,104lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 470km292mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,461mm176in |
| Width | 1,972mm78in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 273g/km | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | - | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 5,250-7,000 rpm | 2,350-5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 13.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW |
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 has 6 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 3.8 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 470 km 292 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 470 km 292 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 273 g/km | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 63 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























