BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0vsBMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (F82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions194 g/km
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 431hp321kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,537kg3,389lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | 723km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,461mm176in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,383mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | 194g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 5,250-7,000 rpm | 2,350-5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 21 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 565 km 351 mi |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 723 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 431 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | 723 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | 194 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 | BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























