BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0vsBMW M4 (G82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,537kg3,389lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 546km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,393mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-6,130 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has 49 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 4.1 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 4.2 s |
Although BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has more power, BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 723 km 449 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 546 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 546 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 | BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Is 163 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























