BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions194 g/km
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,537kg3,389lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 265hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 520km323mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,461mm176in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | 228g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 5,250-7,000 rpm | 2,350-5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW |
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 21 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 4.1 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 723 km 449 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 520 km 323 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 520 km 323 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | 228 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 13 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 203 km (126 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























