Car comparison

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6vsBMW M4 (F82) 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus Evora Sport 410

3.5 V6

410 hp3456 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

3.0

431 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2014-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Most powerful
    431 hp
    321 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    204 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    290 km/h
    180 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,337 kg
    2,948 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    307 hp/t
    229 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
410hp306kW
431hp321kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,337kg2,948lb
1,497kg3,300lb
Gross weight-
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.9s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
55.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
12.5s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb
Calculated
288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
619km384mi
Calculated
682km424mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,456cc211cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length-
4,671mm184in
Width-
1,870mm74in
Height-
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase-
2,812mm111in
Front track-
1,579mm62in
Rear track-
1,603mm63in
Ground clearance-
121mm5in
Trunk volume-
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
225g/km
204g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6BMW M4 (F82) 3.0PowerTorque
  • Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V67,000 rpm3,500 rpm7,250 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)3.05,500-7,300 rpm1,850-5,500 rpm7,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.5 s
14.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
12.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
196 km/h
122 mph
186 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
410 hp
306 kW
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 21 hp more than Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
1,337 kg
2,948 lb
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
1,497 kg
3,300 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V64.1 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.04.3 s

Although BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has more power, Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
619 km
384 mi
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
682 km
424 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
410 hp
306 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
Power
410 hp
306 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
Power
410 hp
306 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
4.1 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
4.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
410 hp
306 kW
431 hp
321 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,337 kg
2,948 lb
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
619 km
384 mi
682 km
424 mi
CO2 score
225 g/km
204 g/km
Trunk score
-
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6

  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 21 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora 4003.5 V6
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT3.5 V6
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6 24V
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT4103.5 V6
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 vs BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster