BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0vsBMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series Coupe (F13)
650i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,497 kg3,300 lb
- Best power-to-weight288 hp/t215 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions204 g/km
- Best economy score83/100
BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best estimated range787 km489 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,497kg3,300lb | 1,795kg3,957lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,290kg5,049lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 787km489mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,894mm193in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,369mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,855mm112in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,665mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 460L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | 206g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 116 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i has 19 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 4.3 s |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 4.6 s |
Although BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i has more power, BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 682 km 424 mi |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 787 km 489 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | BMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 787 km 489 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | 206 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 | BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Is 298 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW 6 Series Coupe (F13) 650i
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 105 km (65 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























