Artega GT
Car comparison
Artega GT 3.6 V6vsNissan 370Z 3.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 370Z
3.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Artega GT 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,285 kg2,833 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score81/100
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Most powerful328 hp245 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | Nissan370Z3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 328hp245kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,285kg2,833lb | 1,496kg3,298lb |
| Gross weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 679km422mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,015mm158in | 4,250mm167in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,460mm97in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 235L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 223g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Artega GT 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan 370Z 3.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 6,600 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | Nissan370Z3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW |
Nissan 370Z 3.7 has 28 hp more than Artega GT 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 1,496 kg 3,298 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 4.8 s |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 5.3 s |
Although Nissan 370Z 3.7 has more power, Artega GT 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 679 km 422 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Artega GT 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | Nissan370Z3.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 328 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | 1,496 kg 3,298 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 679 km 422 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 223 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Artega GT 3.6 V6 | Nissan 370Z 3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Artega GT 3.6 V6
- Is 211 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























