Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4vsArtega GT 3.6 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonArtega GT
3.6 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions221 g/km
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Artega GT 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Lightest1,285 kg2,833 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,285kg2,833lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 113.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.7s | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,347mm171in | 4,015mm158in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,306mm51in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,460mm97in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 126mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | 223g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Artega GT 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 7,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 6,600 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.7 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has 20 hp more than Artega GT 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 5.1 s |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 4.8 s |
Although Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has more power, Artega GT 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 691 km 430 mi |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | ArtegaGT3.6 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | 223 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 | Artega GT 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Artega GT 3.6 V6
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























