Car comparison

Artega GT 3.6 V6vsPorsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Artega GT

3.6 V6

300 hp3597 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2010-2012
VS

Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009

S 3.4

320 hp3436 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2009-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Artega GT 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph Unrestricted
    270 km/h
    168 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,285 kg
    2,833 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.7 L/100 km
    17.2 mpg US
    20.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    223 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    708 km
    440 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best economy score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    36/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelArtegaGT3.6 V6PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
Power
300hp224kW
320hp239kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,285kg2,833lb
1,350kg2,976lb
Gross weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,645kg3,627lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
277 km/h
172 mph
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
82.7s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
15.5s
Calculated
18.1s
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
663km412mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
3,436cc210cu in
Length
4,015mm158in
4,347mm171in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,801mm71in
Height
1,180mm46in
1,306mm51in
Wheelbase
2,460mm97in
2,415mm95in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,486mm59in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,528mm60in
Ground clearance-
126mm5in
Trunk volume
300L
260L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
68L
65L
CO2 emissions
223g/km
230g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Artega GT 3.6 V6Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4PowerTorque
  • Artega GT 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ArtegaGT3.6 V66,600 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,850 rpm
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.47,200 rpm4,750 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricArtegaGT3.6 V6PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.5 s
18.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
277 km/h
172 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
183 km/h
114 mph
174 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
320 hp
239 kW

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has 20 hp more than Artega GT 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
1,350 kg
2,976 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
277 km/h
172 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V64.8 s
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.45.2 s

Although Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has more power, Artega GT 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
708 km
440 mi
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
663 km
412 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
320 hp
239 kW
5.2 s
277 km/h
172 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,015 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
277 km/h
172 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,347 mm
171.1 in
Height
1,306 mm
51.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
277 km/h
172 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
4.8 s
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleArtegaGT3.6 V6PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
Power
300 hp
224 kW
320 hp
239 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
277 km/h
172 mph
Lightness
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,015 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,347 mm
171.1 in
Height
1,306 mm
51.4 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
663 km
412 mi
CO2 score
223 g/km
230 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleArtega GT 3.6 V6Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Artega GT 3.6 V6

  • Is 65 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 7 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Artega GT 3.6 V6
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 V6
S 3.4
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
S 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4vsPorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
3.6 V6
135i
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i
S 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
3.6 V6
3.5 V6
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsLotusEvora3.5 V6
S 3.4
Carrera 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 3.4
3.6 V6
3.8 V6 24V
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsHyundaiGenesis Coupe3.8 V6 24V
S 3.4
2.0
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
3.6 V6
3.0
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsBMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
S 3.4
3.7
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4vsNissan370Z3.7
3.6 V6
E 350 BlueEFFICIENCY V6
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 350 BlueEFFICIENCY V6
S 3.4
Carrera 3.0
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0
Artega GT 3.6 V6 vs Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster