Car comparison

Artega GT 3.6 V6vsBMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Artega GT

3.6 V6

300 hp3597 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2010-2012
VS

BMW 1M Coupe (E82)

3.0

340 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Artega GT 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph Unrestricted
    270 km/h
    168 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,285 kg
    2,833 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    233 hp/t
    174 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    708 km
    440 mi
  • Best economy score
    81/100

BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0

  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.6 L/100 km
    17.3 mpg US
    20.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    370 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelArtegaGT3.6 V6BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Power
300hp224kW
340hp254kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,285kg2,833lb
1,495kg3,296lb
Gross weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
63.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
17.3s
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
708km440mi
Calculated
552km343mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,015mm158in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,803mm71in
Height
1,180mm46in
1,420mm56in
Wheelbase
2,460mm97in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,541mm61in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,541mm61in
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume
300L
370L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
68L
53L
CO2 emissions
223g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Artega GT 3.6 V6BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0PowerTorque
  • Artega GT 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ArtegaGT3.6 V66,600 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,850 rpm
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.05,900 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,150 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricArtegaGT3.6 V6BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
17.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
183 km/h
114 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
340 hp
254 kW

BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 has 40 hp more than Artega GT 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
1,495 kg
3,296 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V64.8 s
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.04.9 s

Although BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 has more power, Artega GT 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Artega GT 3.6 V6 and BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
227 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
708 km
440 mi
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
552 km
343 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
340 hp
254 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,015 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,420 mm
55.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
4.8 s
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ArtegaGT3.6 V6
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
227 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleArtegaGT3.6 V6BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,285 kg
2,833 lb
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,015 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,420 mm
55.9 in
Range score
708 km
440 mi
552 km
343 mi
CO2 score
223 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
233 hp/t
174 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
227 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleArtega GT 3.6 V6BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Artega GT 3.6 V6

  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Artega GT 3.6 V6
BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 V6
S 3.4
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4
3.0
650i
VS
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i
3.6 V6
135i
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i
3.6 V6
3.5 V6
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsLotusEvora3.5 V6
3.0
M235i
VS
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0vsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)M235i
3.6 V6
3.8 V6 24V
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsHyundaiGenesis Coupe3.8 V6 24V
3.0
650i
VS
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0vsBMW6 Series (E63)Facelift 2007650i
3.6 V6
E 350 BlueEFFICIENCY V6
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 350 BlueEFFICIENCY V6
3.0
640i
VS
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)640i
3.6 V6
3.7
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsNissan370Z3.7
3.0
M 3.2
VS
BMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0vsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)M 3.2
3.6 V6
2.5 TFSI
VS
ArtegaGT3.6 V6vsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
Artega GT 3.6 V6 vs BMW 1M Coupe (E82) 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster