Alpina D3 Touring (E91)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 DieselvsPeugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 207 SW
1.6 RC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions160 g/km
- Best estimated range1,245 km774 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,353 kg2,983 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 174hp130kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,353kg2,983lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 67.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,245km774mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,156mm164in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,748mm69in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,527mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,467mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 337L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,258L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW |
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel has 26 hp more than Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 7.7 s |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.6 s |
Although Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel has more power, Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,245 km 774 mi |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW | 7.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 174 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,245 km 774 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 337 L 11.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel | Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 569 km (354 mi) more estimated range
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Is 182 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























