Alpina D3 Touring (E91)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 DieselvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS Wagon
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,245 km774 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 34.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,245km774mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,543mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 419L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,273L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 34.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 7.7 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,245 km 774 mi |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 699 km 434 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,245 km 774 mi | 699 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 546 km (339 mi) more estimated range
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























