Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsAlpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina D3 Touring (E91)
2.0 Diesel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions160 g/km
- Best estimated range1,245 km774 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 1,245km774mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,513mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,385L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 has 20 hp more than Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 5.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 569 km 353 mi |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,245 km 774 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 1,245 km 774 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 676 km (420 mi) more estimated range
- Has 43 L more trunk volume
- Emits 83 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























