Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GTvsAlpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina D3 Touring (E91)
2.0 Diesel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,245km774mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,513mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,385L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
- Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has 4 hp more than Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 8.2 s |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 7.7 s |
Although Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has more power, Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | AlpinaD3 Touring (E91)2.0 Diesel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,245 km 774 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Alpina D3 Touring (E91) 2.0 Diesel
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























