Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GTvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | - |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has 26 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 8.2 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Has 26 hp more
- Is 148 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 33 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























