Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GTvsRenault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III Grandtour
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Lightest1,391 kg3,067 lb
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,391kg3,067lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 1,884kg4,154lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 73.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,559mm179in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,766mm70in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,703mm106in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,595L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has 24 hp more than Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 8.2 s |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 8.0 s |
Although Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has more power, Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Is 74 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























