Alpina D3 (E90)
Car comparison
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsRenault Latitude 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 214hp160kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,545mm179in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,413mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 4,100 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 214 hp 160 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 has 26 hp more than Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.9 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 214 hp 160 kW | 6.9 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 214 hp 160 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel | Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 350 km (217 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Has 26 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























