Car comparison

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer IX

Ralliart 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,017 km
    632 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
214hp160kW
240hp179kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
309Nm228lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,365kg3,009lb
Gross weight
2,010kg4,431lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
23.3s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,017km632mi
Calculated
702km436mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,545mm179in
4,570mm180in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,760mm69in
Height
1,413mm56in
1,505mm59in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,513mm60in
1,530mm60in
Trunk volume
450L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
59L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0PowerTorque
  • Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel4,100 rpm2,000 rpm4,350 rpm
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.06,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.3 s
23.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
214 hp
160 kW
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 has 26 hp more than Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel.

The biggest power difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
309 Nm
228 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
244 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel6.9 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.07.0 s

Although Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 has more power, Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
1,017 km
632 mi
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
702 km
436 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
214 hp
160 kW
6.9 s
244 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
Power
214 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,545 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,413 mm
55.6 in
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
Power
214 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.9 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
214 hp
160 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.0 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,545 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,413 mm
55.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Range score
1,017 km
632 mi
702 km
436 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel

  • Has 141 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 314 km (195 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Ralliart 2.0
3.5i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsNissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.5 T5
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Ralliart 2.0
3.5 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsRenaultLatitude3.5 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolkswagenJetta V2.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
2.0 TSI
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
Ralliart 2.0
3.3 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel
250 V6
VS
AlpinaD3 (E90)2.0 Bi-Turbo DieselvsLexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2008250 V6
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
Alpina D3 (E90) 2.0 Bi-Turbo Diesel vs Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster