Car comparison

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina B7 (F02)

4.4 V8

540 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2015
VS

Bentley Mulsanne II

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    540 hp
    403 kW
  • Lightest
    2,160 kg
    4,762 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    250 hp/t
    186 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.3 L/100 km
    16.4 mpg US
    19.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    769 km
    478 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
540hp403kW
512hp382kW
Torque
730Nm538lb-ft
1,020Nm752lb-ft
Curb weight
2,160kg4,762lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Gross weight
2,780kg6,129lb
3,090kg6,812lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
296 km/h
184 mph
To 99% top speed
56.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
12.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
250hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton
Calculated
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
769km478mi
Calculated
568km353mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,232mm206in
5,575mm219in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,521mm60in
Wheelbase
3,210mm126in
3,266mm129in
Front track
1,621mm64in
1,615mm64in
Rear track
1,628mm64in
1,652mm65in
Trunk volume
500L
443L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
80L
96L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V85,200-6,250 rpm2,800-5,000 rpm6,500 rpm
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V84,200 rpm1,750 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.0 s
15.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
296 km/h
184 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
185 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
540 hp
403 kW
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 has 28 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8: 28 hp (21 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
2,585 kg
5,699 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V84.6 s
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V85.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 6.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
250 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
769 km
478 mi
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
568 km
353 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
540 hp
403 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,232 mm
206.0 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
4.6 s
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
250 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
512 hp
382 kW
Torque
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Lightness
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
Fuel consumption
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,232 mm
206.0 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Range score
769 km
478 mi
568 km
353 mi
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
250 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.20 LC100 km29.57 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.29 LC100 mi47.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,730 LC/year4,436 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8

  • Has 28 hp more
  • Is 425 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 57 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Has 290 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
4.4 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
4.4 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
4.4 V8
760i
VS
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8vsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012760i
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
4.4 V8
4.0 TFSI COD V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8
6.75 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
4.4 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 vs Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster