Car comparison

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8vsJaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina B7 (F02)

4.4 V8

540 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2015
VS

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2012-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    730 Nm
    538 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.3 L/100 km
    16.4 mpg US
    19.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    769 km
    478 mi
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
540hp403kW
550hp410kW
Torque
730Nm538lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
2,160kg4,762lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
2,780kg6,129lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
12.0s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
250hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton
Calculated
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
769km478mi
Calculated
604km376mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
5,232mm206in
4,981mm196in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,939mm76in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
3,210mm126in
2,909mm115in
Front track
1,621mm64in
1,549mm61in
Rear track
1,628mm64in
1,563mm62in
Trunk volume
500L
540L
Max trunk volume-
963L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
70L
CO2 emissions-
270g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V85,200-6,250 rpm2,800-5,000 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.0 s
11.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
206 km/h
128 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
540 hp
403 kW
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has more power, Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
250 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
769 km
478 mi
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
604 km
376 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
540 hp
403 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,232 mm
206.0 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
4.6 s
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8
250 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaB7 (F02)4.4 V8JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
2,160 kg
4,762 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,232 mm
206.0 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
769 km
478 mi
604 km
376 mi
CO2 score
-
270 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
250 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
Consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.20 LC100 km20.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.29 LC100 mi32.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,730 LC/year3,045 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8
Jaguar XF (X250) R-S 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alpina B7 (F02) 4.4 V8 vs Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster