Alpina B6 Coupe (E63)
Car comparison
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 SvsAston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V12 Zagato
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight308 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption22.0 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range488 km303 mi
- Best economy score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 725Nm535lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | 24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 308hp/t229kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 376km234mi Calculated | 488km303mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,385mm173in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,250mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,570mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,598mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 388g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 5,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 199 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S has 13 hp more than Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 4.5 s |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 4.2 s |
Although Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S has more power, Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 376 km 234 mi |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 488 km 303 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.5 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.2 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S |
| 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 |
| 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | Aston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 376 km 234 mi | 488 km 303 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 388 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 308 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S | Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK | 16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 32.55 LC100 km | 28.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 52.38 LC100 mi | 46.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,790 L737 US gal614 UK gal | 2,460 L650 US gal541 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,883 LC/year | 4,305 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 155 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Aston Martin V12 Zagato 6.0 V12
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























