Alpina B6 Coupe (E63)
Car comparison
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 SvsAUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI R8 Coupe (42)
5.2 FSI V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score52/100
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.1 L/100 km11.1 mpg US13.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Best economy score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 725Nm535lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 61.1s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 323hp/t241kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 376km234mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,434mm175in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,252mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,598mm63in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 100L |
| Max trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 326g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: Power / Torque
- AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 5,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 11.4 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW |
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S has 5 hp more than AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 4.5 s |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 3.9 s |
Although Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S has more power, AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 376 km 234 mi |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.5 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.9 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S |
| 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 18.6 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.2 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 376 km 234 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 326 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S | AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 32.55 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 52.38 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,790 L737 US gal614 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,883 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 195 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 350 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 271 km (168 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























