Car comparison

Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 SvsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina B6 Coupe (E63)

4.4 V8 S

530 hp4398 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2008-2010
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

530 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S

  • Fastest top speed
    318 km/h
    198 mph
  • Most powerful
    530 hp
    395 kW
  • Highest torque
    725 Nm
    535 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,720 kg
    3,792 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    308 hp/t
    230 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.1 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.3 L/100 km
    13.6 mpg US
    16.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    617 km
    383 mi
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530hp395kW
530hp395kW
Torque
725Nm535lb-ft
612Nm451lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
70.8s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
45.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
3.1s
0-200 km/h
13.0s
Calculated
8.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton
Calculated
352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
376km234mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,398cc268cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,820mm190in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,855mm73in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,371mm54in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,558mm61in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,598mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume-
315L
Max trunk volume
450L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 SNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S5,500 rpm4,750 rpm5,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
3.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
7.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
9.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
121 mph
220 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
530 hp
395 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
725 Nm
535 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
612 Nm
451 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
318 km/h
198 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S4.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V63.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
18.6 L/100 km
12.6 mpg US
15.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S: 6.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
376 km
234 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
617 km
383 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
530 hp
395 kW
4.5 s
318 km/h
198 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW
3.1 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,371 mm
54.0 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
18.6 L/100 km
12.6 mpg US
15.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
18.6 L/100 km
12.6 mpg US
15.2 mpg UK
4.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
3.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 S
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
18.6 L/100 km
12.6 mpg US
15.2 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
530 hp
395 kW
Torque
725 Nm
535 lb-ft
612 Nm
451 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
3.1 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
18.6 L/100 km
12.6 mpg US
15.2 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,371 mm
54.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
376 km
234 mi
617 km
383 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
308 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 SNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
Consumption18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km32.55 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi52.38 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,790 L737 US gal614 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,883 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S

  • Has 113 Nm more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 135 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 240 km (149 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8 S
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SvsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
4.4 V8 S
5.9 V12
VS
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SvsAston MartinDBS V125.9 V12
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
4.4 V8 S
5.7i V12 48V
VS
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SvsFerrari612 Scaglietti5.7i V12 48V
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
4.4 V8 S
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
VS
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SvsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
3.8 V6
6.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Vantage6.0
4.4 V8 S
Z06 7.0 i V8
VS
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SvsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8
3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12
3.8 V6
AMG C 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
4.4 V8 S
GT2 3.6
VS
AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 SvsPorsche911 (997)GT2 3.6
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 S vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster