Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6vsPorsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

530 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012
VS

Porsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008

Turbo S 3.8

530 hp3800 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2010-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,585 kg
    3,494 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    334 hp/t
    249 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.5 L/100 km
    14.3 mpg US
    17.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
Power
530hp395kW
530hp395kW
Torque
612Nm451lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
45.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
47.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.1s
3.3s
0-200 km/h
8.8s
Calculated
9.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.0s
Calculated
3.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.7s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
334hp/t249kW/t152hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
442Nm/t296lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
617km383mi
Calculated
588km365mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,800cc232cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,450mm175in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,852mm73in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,300mm51in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,350mm93in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,600mm63in
-
Ground clearance
105mm4in
-
Trunk volume
315L
-
Max trunk volume-
105L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
67L
CO2 emissions-
268g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.86,250-6,750 rpm2,100-4,250 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.0 s
3.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.1 s
3.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.8 s
9.3 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.7 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.0 s
9.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
530 hp
395 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
612 Nm
451 lb-ft
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
1,585 kg
3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V63.1 s
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.83.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
334 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
617 km
383 mi
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
588 km
365 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW
3.1 s
315 km/h
196 mph
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
530 hp
395 kW
3.3 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK

Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
3.1 s
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
3.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
334 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
Power
530 hp
395 kW
530 hp
395 kW
Torque
612 Nm
451 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.1 s
3.3 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Fuel consumption
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Range score
617 km
383 mi
588 km
365 mi
CO2 score
-
268 g/km
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
334 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8
Consumption12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.00 LC100 km19.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.80 LC100 mi32.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,150 LC/year2,993 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 210 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8

  • Has 88 Nm more
  • Is 155 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Porsche 911 (997) Turbo S 3.8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
GT2 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (997)GT2 3.6
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
6.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Vantage6.0
Turbo S 3.8
Turbo 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8
3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12
Turbo S 3.8
GT2 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
AMG C 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
Turbo S 3.8
GT3 4.0
VS
Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 vs Porsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008 Turbo S 3.8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster