Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6vsPorsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008
Turbo 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight313 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score78/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Best estimated range617 km383 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best performance score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 612Nm451lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated | 408Nm/t273lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 617km383mi Calculated | 588km365mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 3,800cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,450mm175in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,350mm93in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 105L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 268g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-6,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.1 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 10.3 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 has 30 hp more than Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 612 Nm 451 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 3.1 s |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 3.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 305 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 617 km 383 mi |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 588 km 365 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.1 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.6 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 305 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 612 Nm 451 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.1 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 617 km 383 mi | 588 km 365 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 268 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 305 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 | Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
- Has 38 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























