Car comparison

Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24VvsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina B3 (E36)

3.2 i 24V

265 hp3152 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1996-1999
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan1999-2001

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    373 Nm
    275 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    206 hp/t
    154 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,330 kg
    2,932 lb
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Power
265hp198kW
280hp209kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
373Nm275lb-ft
Curb weight
1,330kg2,932lb
1,360kg2,998lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
17.1s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,152cc192cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,433mm175in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,698mm67in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,373mm54in
1,405mm55in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,510mm99in
Front track
1,410mm56in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,423mm56in
1,505mm59in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
435L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24VMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0PowerTorque
  • Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V5,800 rpm4,400 rpm6,050 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.06,500 rpm2,750 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.1 s
14.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
179 km/h
111 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
265 hp
198 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 has 15 hp more than Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V.

The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
373 Nm
275 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
1,360 kg
2,998 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V5.9 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.04.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
199 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,373 mm
54.1 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,373 mm
54.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
-
Trunk score
435 L
15.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
199 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V

  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 43 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 i 24V
2.7 BiTurbo V6
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
3.2 i 24V
2.0 Biturbo
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsMaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
3.2 i 24V
2.3 Turbo
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsVolvoS702.3 Turbo
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
3.2 i 24V
740i
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsBMW7 Series (E38)740i
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
3.2 i 24V
540i V8
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
3.2 i 24V
3.0T V6
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
3.2 i 24V
2.8 24V T6
VS
AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24VvsVolvoS802.8 24V T6
2.0
4.2 V8 40V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster