Car comparison

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale

2.0 T4

272 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    170 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    235.2 mpg US
    282.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,000 km
    4,350 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
254hp189kW
272hp203kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,470kg5,445lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
3,020kg6,658lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1L/100 km235.2mpg US282.5mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
7,000km4,350mi
Calculated
520km323mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
5,042mm199in
4,527mm178in
Width
1,977mm78in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,780mm70in
1,657mm65in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,574mm62in
Rear track
1,684mm66in
1,573mm62in
Ground clearance
190mm7in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
264L
500L
Max trunk volume-
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
70L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T45,200 rpm3,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
25.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has 18 hp more than Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
239 km/h
149 mph
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T54.9 s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T46.5 s

Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has more power, Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 8.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,000 km
4,350 mi
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
520 km
323 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
4.9 s
239 km/h
149 mph
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
4.9 s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
254 hp
189 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
6.5 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
1.0 L/100 km
235.2 mpg US
282.5 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
Range score
7,000 km
4,350 mi
520 km
323 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Consumption1 L/100 km235.2 mpg US282.5 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km1.75 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi2.82 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used150 L40 US gal33 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost262.50 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 8.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,480 km (4,026 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 870 kg lighter
  • Has 67 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 236 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 T4
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
2.0 GME
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
EM-P 2.0TD T5
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 vs Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster