Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0vsSubaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018 2.5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Veloce 2.0

280 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Subaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018

2.5

300 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    148 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    906 km
    563 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
407Nm300lb-ft
Curb weight
1,530kg3,373lb
1,566kg3,452lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
49.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
48.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
906km563mi
Calculated
536km333mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,595mm181in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,650mm104in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,540mm61in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
480L
460L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
60L
CO2 emissions
148g/km
259g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.05,250 rpm2,250 rpm5,500 rpm
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.56,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
16.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
183 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
280 hp
209 kW
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
300 hp
224 kW

Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
407 Nm
300 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
1,566 kg
3,452 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.05.2 s
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.55.2 s

Although Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: 4.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
906 km
563 mi
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
536 km
333 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
300 hp
224 kW
5.2 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.2 s
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
1,566 kg
3,452 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
906 km
563 mi
536 km
333 mi
CO2 score
148 g/km
259 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
183 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km19.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi31.54 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,940 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0

  • Is 36 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 371 km (230 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 111 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 7 Nm more
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
Subaru WRX STI 2.5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Veloce 2.0
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsSubaruWRX STI2.5
Veloce 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsSubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5
Veloce 2.0
2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
Veloce 2.0
Long Range 75 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsTeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
2.5
2.0
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.5
2.0
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Veloce 2.0
2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsCadillacCTS III2.0
2.5
2.0 TFSI
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Veloce 2.0
450h V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015450h V6
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 vs Subaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018 2.5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster