Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsSubaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018 2.5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Subaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018

2.5

300 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    163 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,028 km
    639 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Highest torque
    407 Nm
    300 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,566 kg
    3,452 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    192 hp/t
    143 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
407Nm300lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,566kg3,452lb
Gross weight-
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
58.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
48.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
18.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,028km639mi
Calculated
536km333mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,595mm181in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,650mm104in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,540mm61in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
540L
460L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
60L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
259g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.56,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.1 s
16.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
183 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
407 Nm
300 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
1,566 kg
3,452 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.05.8 s
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.55.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: 4.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,028 km
639 mi
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
536 km
333 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
300 hp
224 kW
5.2 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.8 s
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,566 kg
3,452 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,028 km
639 mi
536 km
333 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
259 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km19.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi31.54 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year2,940 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 492 km (306 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 96 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5

  • Has 7 Nm more
  • Is 149 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Subaru WRX STI 2.5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsSubaruWRX STI2.5
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsSubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.5
2.0
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.5
2.0 TFSI
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.5
E 350
VS
SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Subaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018 2.5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster