Subaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Subaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018 2.5vsSubaru WRX STI 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru WRX STI
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 2018-present
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Subaru WRX STI 2.5 2014-2017
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions242 g/km
- Best estimated range577 km358 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,566kg3,452lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 47.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 536km333mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,595mm181in | 4,595mm181in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 259g/km | 242g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 2018-present: Power / Torque
- Subaru WRX STI 2.5 2014-2017: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 113 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 300 hp 224 kW |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 1,566 kg 3,452 lb |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 5.2 s |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 5.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Subaru WRX STI 2.5 2014-2017 and Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 2018-present: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 536 km 333 mi |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru WRX STI 2.5 2014-2017 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.52018-present | SubaruWRX STI2.52014-2017 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,566 kg 3,452 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 536 km 333 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 259 g/km | 242 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 2018-present | Subaru WRX STI 2.5 2014-2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 2018-present
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Subaru WRX STI 2.5 2014-2017
- Is 66 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 41 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























