AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsSubaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru WRX STI · Facelift 2018
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight201 hp/t150 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,566kg3,452lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 48.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 201hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 536km333mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,466mm176in | 4,595mm181in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631mm104in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 259g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 183 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 1,566 kg 3,452 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4.7 s |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | SubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,566 kg 3,452 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 536 km 333 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 259 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 101 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Subaru WRX STI Facelift 2018 2.5
- Has 7 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























