Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,351 km
    839 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,715 kg
    3,781 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    175 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Gross weight-
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
18.1s
Calculated
20.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,028km639mi
Calculated
1,351km839mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
540L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
77L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
149g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.1 s
20.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
170 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
1,835 kg
4,045 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.05.8 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V66.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,028 km
639 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
1,351 km
839 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.8 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
1,028 km
639 mi
1,351 km
839 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
149 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6

  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 323 km (201 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Jaguar XJ (X351) 3.0d V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0d V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
3.0d V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
3.0d V6
4.2 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0d V6
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.0d V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
3.0d V6
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster