Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0vsTesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3
Long Range 75 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
- Most powerful287 hp214 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 287hp214kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,741kg3,838lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,178kg4,802lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 45.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 906km563mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 148g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 287 hp 214 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh has 7 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 5.2 s |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 5.3 s |
Although Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 and Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0 | TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 287 hp 214 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 906 km 563 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 148 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.0
- Is 211 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























