Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

163 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.2 JTD

150 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    163 hp
    122 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    105 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,341 km
    834 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,445 kg
    3,186 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0dAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
163hp122kW
150hp112kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,555kg3,428lb
1,445kg3,186lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
-
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
35.0s
Calculated
35.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,341km834mi
Calculated
1,238km769mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,625mm64in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
505L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
52L
CO2 emissions
109g/km
109g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0dAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.0 s
35.4 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
150 hp
112 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 13 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,445 kg
3,186 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
227 km/h
141 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.7 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD8.2 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,341 km
834 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
1,238 km
769 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
8.7 s
227 km/h
141 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
150 hp
112 kW
8.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
8.7 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0dAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
Power
163 hp
122 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.2 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
Fuel consumption
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
1,341 km
834 mi
1,238 km
769 mi
CO2 score
109 g/km
109 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.17 LC100 km7.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.55 LC100 mi11.83 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used615 L162 US gal135 UK gal630 L166 US gal139 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,076 LC/year1,103 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2 JTD
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.2 JTD
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2 JTD
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.2 JTD
C 180
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.2 JTD
C 200d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.2 JTD
1.4 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTDvsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD - car comparison - FastVsFaster