Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,341 km834 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,794kg3,955lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,341km834mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 448L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,474L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 163 hp 122 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp has 41 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 1,341 km 834 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d204 hp | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d163 hp | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,341 km 834 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 7.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,076 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d 204 hp
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d 163 hp
- Is 239 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
- Has 57 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























