Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
D180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk448 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,143 km710 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,794kg3,955lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,143km710mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 448L | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,474L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 24 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,143 km 710 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,143 km 710 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 24 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Is 229 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























