Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 E 220dvsJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,794 kg3,955 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,794kg3,955lb |
| Gross weight | 2,555kg5,633lb | - |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,935mm194in | 4,962mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,466mm58in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,608mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 448L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,474L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.8 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 847 km 527 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 220d
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 92 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 26 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























