Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,238 km769 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 35.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 651km404mi Calculated | 1,238km769mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,595cc97cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 35.4 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 has 6 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 651 km 404 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 651 km 404 mi | 1,238 km 769 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 587 km (365 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























