Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,238 km769 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.4s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,238km769mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,458mm176in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,637mm104in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 845L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.4 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.2 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,238 km 769 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























