AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,238 km769 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.0s Calculated | 35.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,064km661mi Calculated | 1,238km769mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,458mm176in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 880L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 121g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.0 s | 35.4 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,064 km 661 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,064 km 661 mi | 1,238 km 769 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 121 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























