Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t77 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,238 km769 mi
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.8s Calculated | 35.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 854km531mi Calculated | 1,238km769mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 126g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | - | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 3,050 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.8 s | 35.4 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 854 km 531 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 854 km 531 mi | 1,238 km 769 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 126 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 384 km (239 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























