Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDvsVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,238 km769 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,364 kg3,007 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,364kg3,007lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.4s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,238km769mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.4 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 1,364 kg 3,007 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,364 kg 3,007 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,238 km 769 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD | Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 160 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























