Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight99 hp/t74 kW/t10.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,165kg4,773lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 33.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 854km531mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 33.8 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 889 km 552 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 854 km 531 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 854 km 531 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























