Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTDvsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
- Lightest1,442 kg3,179 lb
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions105 g/km
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Best economy score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,442kg3,179lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.4s Calculated | 37.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,238km769mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,625mm64in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 105g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-3,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.4 s | 37.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.2 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,238 km 769 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 105 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 108 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
- Is 3 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 262 km (163 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























