Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
- Lightest1,442 kg3,179 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions105 g/km
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,442kg3,179lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 37.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,341km834mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 105g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-3,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 37.9 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 150 hp 112 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 13 hp more than Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,341 km 834 mi |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,442 kg 3,179 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,341 km 834 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 105 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
- Is 113 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























