Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurbovsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

2.0 Turbo

200 hp1995 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2022
VS

Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,037 km
    644 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,647kg3,631lb
Gross weight
2,005kg4,420lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
59.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
66.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
26.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
817km508mi
Calculated
1,037km644mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,678mm184in
Width
1,860mm73in
-
Height
1,438mm57in
1,410mm56in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,571mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,641mm65in
1,608mm63in
Trunk volume
480L
356L
Max trunk volume-
1,236L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
56L
CO2 emissions
164g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurboJaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo4,500 rpm1,750 rpm4,750 rpm
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
26.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW

Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
1,647 kg
3,631 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo6.6 s
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d7.3 s

Although Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
817 km
508 mi
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
1,037 km
644 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
356 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,678 mm
184.2 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.6 s
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 Turbo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurboJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
356 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,678 mm
184.2 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in
Range score
817 km
508 mi
1,037 km
644 mi
CO2 score
164 g/km
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
356 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 TurboJaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo

  • Is 218 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 124 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 220 km (137 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Turbo
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0d
D180
VS
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
2.0 Turbo
A 220
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220
2.0d
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 Turbo
C 220d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0d
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0 Turbo
40 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201640 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
E 200
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
2.0d
E 220d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0dvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
2.0 Turbo
320d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.0 TurbovsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.0 Turbo vs Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster