Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsAlfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
1.8 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 289Nm213lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,776mm70in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 155L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 610L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 5,000 rpm | 1,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 has 40 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 5.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 530 km 330 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 | Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Has 40 hp more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Has 31 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Uses 5.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 334 km (207 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























