Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsBMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Coupe (E46)
330Ci
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range692 km430 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score57/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 289Nm213lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 84.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,488mm177in |
| Width | 1,776mm70in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,369mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,471mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 155L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 has 9 hp more than BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 6.3 s |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 4.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 530 km 330 mi |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6 | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)330Ci | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 289 Nm 213 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 330Ci
- Has 11 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 162 km (101 mi) more estimated range
- Has 285 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























