Car comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6vsAUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003

3.2 V6

240 hp3179 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2004
VS

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    168 hp/t
    125 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.9 L/100 km
    15.8 mpg US
    19.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    585 km
    363 mi
  • Largest trunk
    220 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
289Nm213lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,445kg3,186lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
1,855kg4,090lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
85.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
85.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
24.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
530km330mi
Calculated
585km363mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,179cc194cu in
3,189cc195cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,041mm159in
Width
1,776mm70in
1,764mm69in
Height
1,318mm52in
1,346mm53in
Wheelbase
2,540mm100in
2,422mm95in
Front track
1,530mm60in
1,528mm60in
Rear track
1,508mm59in
1,513mm60in
Trunk volume
155L
220L
Max trunk volume-
490L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
62L
CO2 emissions-
254g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24VPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V66,200 rpm4,800 rpm6,450 rpm
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V6,300 rpm2,800-3,200 rpm6,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
24.9 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
100 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
289 Nm
213 lb-ft
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
255 km/h
158 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V has more power, Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
240 hp
179 kW
6.3 s
255 km/h
158 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
6.5 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
155 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.3 s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
289 Nm
213 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.5 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
155 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in
Range score
530 km
330 mi
585 km
363 mi
CO2 score
-
254 g/km
Trunk score
155 L
5.5 cu ft
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) Facelift 2003 3.2 V6

  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 31 Nm more
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 65 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.2 V6
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) · Facelift 2003 3.2 V6 vs AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster