Acura TL III (UA6/7)
Car comparison
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24VvsChevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet SSR
5.3 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque449 Nm331 lb-ft
- Largest trunk1,130 L
- Best economy score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 273hp204kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 323Nm238lb-ft | 449Nm331lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 2,159kg4,760lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 113.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,210cc196cu in | 5,326cc325cu in |
| Length | 4,808mm189in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,835mm72in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,631mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,946mm116in |
| Front track | 1,577mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,648mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 454L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,130L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 has 27 hp more than Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 7.6 s |
Although Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 has more power, Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ChevroletSSR5.3 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 273 hp 204 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 2,159 kg 4,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Is 504 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet SSR 5.3 i V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 126 Nm more
- Has 676 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























